liz-dudley-law
Facebook
Google+
LinkedIn
Yelp
316.746.3969
Call us today for your free case evaluation.
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Liz Dudley

      Elizabeth ‘Liz’ Dudley is an attorney and former Registered Nurse who represents/has represented injured clients from Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, California, Texas, Tennessee, Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, North Carolina and other states nationwide, who are injured from harmful & defective drugs, medical devices, medical negligence and other professional negligence. Attorney Dudley also represents whistleblowers and others who have claims against the healthcare industry and the government under the False Claims Act [Qui Tam Cases].

      The Dudley Law Firm is unique in that Liz Dudley, because of her education, training, experience & knowledge of medicine and the law, she has special expertise in understanding the medical issues involved in complex medical-legal, pharmaceutical, device and mass tort cases [especially those involving women]. Ms. Dudley has access to and obtains world class experts in her cases.

      About Liz Dudley
    • Close
  • Dangerous Drugs
    • white-drugsDangerous Drugs
        • Prilosec Lawsuit
        • Taxotere
        • Actos
        • Benicar, Tribenzor, and Azor
        • Fluoroquinolones
        • Risperdal
        • Talcum Powder
        • SSRI Antidepressants
        • Testosterone
        • Viagra & Melanoma
        • Xarelto Lawsuit
        • Yaz, Yasmin, Ocella, Beyaz, Natazia
    • Free Case Evaluation

      Speak with Liz Dudley personally free of charge to evaluate your case

      Free case review
    • Close
  • Toxic Torts
    • Free Case Evaluation

      Speak with Liz Dudley personally free of charge to evaluate your case

      Free case review
    • Toxic Torts

        • Asbestosis
        • Mesothelioma
    • Close
  • Defective Medical Devices
    • Defective Medical Devices

        • Talcum Powder
        • Mirena
        • Transvaginal Mesh Implants
        • Inferior Vena Cava Filter
        • NuvaRing
        • Morcellator
        • Bair Hugger
        • Joint Implants
        • Zimmer Persona Knee
        • Metal on Metal Hip Replacement
        • DuPuy Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacement
        • Stryker Rejuvenate/ABG II Hip System
        • Wright Medical Technology
    • Close
  • Our Services
    • Legal Services

        • Publications
        • Client Representation
        • Testimonials
        • Personal Injury Cases: Litigation, Joint Ventures & Consultation
        • Mass Tort Litigation Joint Ventures, Support & Consultation
    • Close
  • Blog
    • Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

      • Bard Vaginal Mesh Plastic Unfit for Humans
        Bard Vaginal Mesh Plastic Unfit for Humans 2016 According to unsealed court records, CR Bard Inc. sold vaginal-mesh devices made of a plastic that its manufacturer warned was not suitable for human surgical use. Managers at Bard’s Davol unit used a resin-based plastic made by a Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. unit to produce hernia-repair mesh...

      More Vaginal Mesh

      Firm News

      • Attorney/Former Nurse Liz Dudley on Generic Drug Law Injustice
        American Association for Justice ["AAJ"] Press Release: Patient Safety at Risk with SCOTUS Mutual v. Bartlett AAJ issued a national press release this afternoon on generic drug immunity and the Mutual v. Bartlett case currently before the Supreme Court.  The Court previously gave all generic drug manufacturers [drugs that are no longer subject to the original patent...
      More Firm News

      Health Alert!

      Get the latest updates from Liz Dudleyabout women’s health concerns. If you or a loved one have suffered from defective drugs or devices, contact the Dudley Law Firm for a free case evaluation. Time is limited to file a claim and you deserve compensation for your hardship..

      More Health Alert!
    • Close
  • Contact
    • Get Help NOW

      GET HELP NOW

      316.746.3969

      If you or a loved one have been affected by a recalled drug or medical device, you may be entitled to compensation

      Free case review
    • Close
  • Testimonials

Morcellator Injury Lawsuit

Contact Attorney Dudley if You Have Been Injured
From a Power Morcellator

morcellator lawyer

PRODUCT: Laparoscopic Power Morcellators [ Surgical device used to remove fibroid tumors from a woman’s uterus & remove the uterus during a hysterectomy]

MANUFACTURER: Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

INJURIES: Spreads undetected type of uterine cancer [which is inside the fibroid tumor] into the abdomen.

Approx 1 in 352 women with fibroids have some undetected cancerous cells inside the fibroid or uterus which this surgical device spreads into the abdomen upon removal. The result is that this device upstages the cancer from Stage I [which if removed whole would not have spread throughout the body] to Stage IV causing leiomyosarcoma [uterine cancer] which is deadly to most women. It is a known medical fact that early diagnosis of cancer increases your chances for survival.

DANGERS OF POWER MORCELLATORS

In April 2014, the FDA issued a safety advisory, stating that the laparoscopic power morcellator, a surgical device widely used to remove fibroids in the uterus, was responsible for the spread of a potentially deadly and aggressive form of cancer in thousands of women across the U.S. This was the first public acknowledgement of the risks with this device– long after the company knew the actual, increased risks. J&J refused to warn the FDA, Doctors and women in this country and when they did give information on the risks, it was inadequate and conflicted with the scientific data that J&J & the FDA were aware of.

WHAT IS A POWER MORCELLATOR?

It is an electrically powered surgical tool with rotating blade primarily used during a hysterectomy or myomectomy [fibroid removal] to remove uterine fibroids [also known as leiomyomas], which are common growths in the uterine wall. Up to 80% of women will have uterine fibroids during their lifetime. During surgery, the morcellator is inserted into the woman & the blade rapidly peels, cores & fragments the fibroid tissue which is removed through a small incision. It is also used to remove the uterus during hysterectomies.

BENEFITS vs RISKS ANALYSIS

J&J marketed this device as being less invasive than a traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy, patients had less recovery time , less bleeding, less scars, less days in the hospital & lower mortality rates than a total abdominal hysterectomy done by either open laparotomy or laparoscopy.
These so-called “benefits” are greatly outweighed by the fatal danger when used in women with an unsuspected malignant uterine sarcoma–typically a leiomyosarcoma– hidden within the fibroid tissue. In these cases, the morcellator disseminates the cancerous tissue throughout the woman’s abdomen, pelvis or other organs, resulting in devastating injuries & death. The FDA estimates that 1 in 352 women undergoing fibroid removal or hysterectomies have undetected uterine sarcoma. However, J&J has disagreed with the FDA & made claims that the incidence is rare, 1 in 100,000 — then they changed it to 1 in 10,000 — then 1 in 7,500. What is the acceptable risk when there is a safer alternative with no risks? I would argue any risk of spreading this type of virulent cancer is unacceptable if it is happening to you.
As a plaintiff’s attorney, we pursue legal claims involving products liability law involving both defective design and failure to warn. The manufacturer knew of the potential presence of cancer in women’s fibroids since the 1990’s and the device’s ability to spread the cancer to other organs, and the existence of a safer, alternative design. saferalternative design theory involves the use of a “closed system”–such as an interoperative bag–that prevents the cancerous tissue from spreading throughout the body.

REGULATORY HISTORY OF THE POWER MORCELLATOR

In 1995 this device was cleared for sale through the 510[k] process and gained popularity among gynecologic surgeons since then. It is estimated that morcellation is used in at least 11% of the nearly 500,000 hysterectomies performed annually in the U.S. This is approximately 55,000 to 75,000 of women who are unknowingly being exposed to the spread of this cancer. They will not know they have this cancer unless one of the following occurs: the pathologist finds the cancerous cells in the tissue removed after surgery; or they develop symptoms months or years later when the cancer is at an advanced stage – which is very bad for a women’s prognosis.
Unfortunately, the first public notification that this device had any such risks was in April of 2014 when the FDA issued a safety alert. The FDA warned that the laparoscopic power morcellator, a surgical device widely used to remove fibroids in the uterus, was responsible for the spread of a potentially deadly and aggressive form of cancer in thousands of women across the U.S. The FDA estimated that 1 in 352 women undergoing fibroid removal or hysterectomies have undetected uterine sarcoma which is at risk of being spread throughout the body by this device.
After this FDA advisory, several large hospitals, such as the Cleveland Clinic and Brigham & Women’s Hospital in Boston, suspended Morcellator procedures. Some health insurers have placed restrictions on coverage for morcellator procedures or have stopped covering these procedures completely.
In July of 2014 the FDA held hearings on the risks of spreading cancer from this device. J&J claimed they took actions immediately when they learned the risks of the device were greater than they anticipated. The American Association of Gynecology representative wanted the FDA to keep the device available as is. There was moving testimony from a cancer victim of this device, Amy Reed, MD. Dr Reed was an anesthesiologist who developed stage IV uterine sarcoma post hysterectomy with the power morcellator. Dr Reed had no prior history of any cancer until after her hysterectomy using this device.
In November 2014 the FDA took more aggressive action by issuing a BLACK BOX WARNING for power morcellators for the majority of women undergoing a hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. They noted that “the use of laparoscopic power morcellators during fibroid surgery may spread cancer, and decrease the long-term survival of patients.” The warning included contraindications for the device, including use in the “removal of uterine tissue containing suspected fibroids in patients who are peri- or post menapausal” and “in gynecologic surgery in which the tissue to be morcellated is known or suspected to contain malignancy.”

WITHDRAWL OF THE POWER MORCELLATOR FROM THE MARKET BY J&J ONLY –BUT THEY CONTINUE TO BE USED BY SURGEONS/HOSPITALS

In July 2014, J&J recalled this device but did not require hospitals to return the device to J&J–. many continue to be in use today. Other manufacturers have not recalled their devices as of 7.2015.
Please spread the word to other women you know who may be undergoing a hysterectomy or fibroid removal. They must ask their doctor if he plans on using this device and refuse to give consent .
If you or a loved one have experienced any of these side effects, please call today for your free evaluation as you have limited amount of time to protect your rights.

FREE CASE EVALUATION

Memberships

*Past and Present

Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Dangerous Drugs
  • Toxic Torts
  • Law Blog
  • Contact

Contact

THE DUDLEY LAW FIRM, LLC
23438 SW Pilot Point Rd.
Suite A

Douglass, Kansas 67039
316.746.3969
316.746.3922
Facebook
Google+
Yelp

Nationwide Attorney

© The Dudley Law Firm, LLC
Website Design and Marketing by Now Media Group